Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 31;2(10):e1098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001098

Table 3. Log likelihood values and parameter estimates under the site models and branch-site models.

Model Para a ln l b Estimates of parameters l c Positively selected sitesd
M0 (one-ratio) 1 −1369.71 ω0 = 0.3856 not allowed
Site models
M1a (Nearly Neutral) 2 −1366.56 p 0 = 0.7704 (p 1 = 0.2296); ω0 = 0.2110 (ω1 = 1) not allowed
M2a (Positive Selection) 4 −1366.22 p 0 = 0.9032; p 1 = 0 (p 2 = 0.0968); ω0 = 0.2736 (ω1 = 1), ω2 = 1.7797 (M1a vs. M2a) 0.68 none
M7 (beta) 2 −1367.06 p = 0.6432; q = 0.9806 not allowed
M8 (beta & ω) 5 −1366.23 p 0 = 0.9054; p = 37.7260; q = 99.0000 (p 1 = 0.0947); ω = 1.7952 (M7 vs. M8) 1.66 none
Branch-site models
M1a 2 −1366.56 p 0 = 0.7704 (p 1 = 0.2296); ω0 = 0.2110 (ω1 = 1)
Model A 4 −1363.55 p 0 = 0; p 1 = 0.7632 (p 2 = 0.2368); ω0 = 0.1827 (ω1 = 1), ω2 = Inf (M1a vs. Model A) 6.02** 544A, 551H, 556G, 661V, 681S
a

The number of parameters estimated in the model.

b

Log likelihood values.

c

LRT to detect positive selection ** P<0.01.

d

Amino acid sites under positive selection based on a Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) probability >95%. No amino acids sites under the model M2a and M8 were shown to be under positive selection.