TABLE 1.
αlimit for f0 for various combinations of h and Ns
|
Ns
|
Strong selection
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 50 | 100 |
| 0 | <0 | <0 | 0.346 | 0.332 | 0.249 | 0.113 | 0.080 |
| 0.252 | 0.113 | 0.080 | |||||
| 0.05 | <0 | <0 | 0.425 | 0.389 | 0.305 | 0.178 | 0.149 |
| 0.1 | |||||||
| 0.1 | <0 | 0.210 | 0.496 | 0.446 | 0.366 | 0.254 | 0.231 |
| 0.2 | |||||||
| 0.2 | <0 | 0.505 | 0.627 | 0.568 | 0.503 | 0.427 | 0.414 |
| 0.4 | |||||||
| 0.3 | 0.394 | 0.696 | 0.752 | 0.701 | 0.657 | 0.613 | 0.607 |
| 0.6 | |||||||
| 0.4 | 0.754 | 0.855 | 0.875 | 0.845 | 0.824 | 0.805 | 0.803 |
| 0.8 | |||||||
| 0.45 | 0.884 | 0.929 | 0.937 | 0.921 | 0.911 | 0.902 | 0.901 |
| 0.9 | |||||||
αlimit was computed by numerically solving for equation
. Under strong selection, analytical approximations (Equations 6a and 6b) are given in italics.