Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 4;335(7624):809. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39342.690220.55

Table 3.

 Results of included studies

Reference Outcome measure Measure of effect Results in exposed group v controls (where applicable) Result
Porterw1 Psychometric Group comparison* Better scores in 2/12 tests v controls P<0.05
Porterw2 Psychometric Group comparison* Deterioration in finger tapping dominant hand (1/12 tests) P<0.01
Zetterbergw3 CSF biomarkers Group comparison* Increase in 3/6 CSF biomarkers v controls and baseline (at rest) P=0.04/0.001
Moriartyw4 Psychometric Group comparison† Improvement in 1/5 tests v controls and baseline P<0.05
Stewartw5 Psychometric Odds ratio, contingency analysis No differences in contingency or odds of abnormality with exposure Not significant
Stewartw5 EEG Odds ratio, contingency analysis No differences in contingency or odds of abnormality with exposure Not significant
Stewartw5 Brain evoked potentials Odds ratio, contingency analysis No differences in contingency or odds of abnormality with exposure Not significant
Butlerw6 Psychometric Group comparison* Improvements in 10/12 tests from baseline P<0.01-0.001
Haglundw7 MRI Group comparison†, contingency analysis Small numbers of abnormalities in boxers and controls Not stated
Haglundw7 CT Group comparison†, contingency analysis CSP in 2/47 boxers v 4/50 controls, no group differences Not stated
Braynew8 Creatine kinase BB Group comparison†, correlation Significantly increased levels v controls and with exposure P<0.01, P=0.05
Masterw9 Psychometric Group comparison* Significant changes v controls in 5/8 tests used P<0.001-0.047
Heilbronnerw10 Psychometric Multivariate analysis Significant changes, both positive (motor) and negative (memory) P<0.0001-0.004
Kempw11 Psychometric Group comparison† Significant difference v controls in 4/5 tests P<0.05
Kempw11 SPECT Contingency analysis 14/34 boxers v 5/34 controls abnormal P<0.02
Mureliusw12 Psychometric Group comparison† No significant difference except finger tapping (dominant hand). P<0.001
Haglundw13 Platelet monoamine oxidase Group comparison * No difference between exposed group and controls Not significant
Haglundw13 Neurological Contingency analysis 1/47 boxers v 3/50 controls abnormal Not significant
Haglundw14 EEG Contingency analysis No differences in contingencies of abnormalities Not significant
Haglundw14 Brain evoked potentials Group comparison† No significant difference between exposed group and controls Not significant
Levinw15 Psychometric Multivariate analysis Exposed group moved closer to control group results P=0.10-0.89
Levinw15 MRI NA No abnormalities found in boxers (MRI not performed in controls) NA
Brooksw16 Psychometric Group comparison* No evidence of neuropsychological abnormalities in boxers Not significant
Thomassenw17 Psychometric Multivariate analysis No significant differences except finger tapping (dominant hand). P<0.01
Thomassenw17 EEG Multivariate analysis No significant difference between exposed and control group Not significant
Thomassenw17 Neurological Contingency analysis “Sparse discrete” findings in boxers and controls Not significant
Holzgrafew18 MRI Contingency analysis 0/13 abnormal before and after exposure Not significant
Jedlinskiw19 Psychometric Contingency analysis, correlation 11/60 abnormal v 0/30 controls, correlation with increasing bouts Not stated, r=0.50
Jedlinskiw19 EEG Contingency analysis, correlation 24/60 abnormal v 2/30 controls, correlation with increasing bouts Not stated, r=0.50
Jedlinskiw19 Neurological Contingency analysis, correlation 33/60 abnormal v 3/30 controls, correlation with increasing bouts Not stated
Rodriguezw20 Regional cerebral blood flow NA No abnormalities NA
McLatchiew21 Psychometric Group comparison* 9/16 abnormal, significant differences v controls in 3/10 tests P<0.05
McLatchiew21 CT Correlation 1/20 abnormal in exposed group (dilated ventricles) Not significant
McLatchiew21 EEG Correlation 8/20 abnormal (various) correlating with increasing number of fights P<0.05
McLatchiew21 Neurological Correlation 7/20 abnormal correlating with increasing number of fights P<0.05
Rossw22 CT NA 7/13 abnormal (not specified) NA
Rossw22 EEG NA 4/8 abnormal NA
Rossw22 Neurological NA 1/8 abnormal NA
Jordanw23 MRI NA 1/4 abnormal (congenital or post-traumatic cyst of hippocampus) NA
Jordanw23 CT NA 1/4 abnormal (congenital or post-traumatic cyst of hippocampus) NA
Legwoldw24 Neurological NA 68 concussions/7000 bouts, none resulting in neurological dysfunction NA
Jordanw25 MRI NA 0/9 abnormal NA
Jordanw25 Neurological NA 0/9 abnormal NA
Cassonw26 Psychometric NA 2/5 abnormal as defined by “impairment index” NA
Cassonw26 CT NA 1/5 abnormal (generalised cerebral atrophy) NA
Cassonw26 EEG NA 1/4 abnormal NA
Cassonw26 Neurological NA 1/5 abnormal (mild “organic mental syndrome,” right Babinsky) NA
Kastew27 Psychometric NA 0/8 abnormal NA
Kastew27 CT NA 1/8 abnormal NA
Kastew27 EEG NA 4/7 abnormal NA
Kastew27 Brain evoked potentials NA 1/7 abnormal NA
Kastew27 Neurological NA 0/8 abnormal NA
Corsellisw28 Histological NA 0/3 abnormal NA
Beaussartw29 EEG Contingency analysis 0/123 abnormal (before v after bout) Not significant
Szymusikw30 Neurological NA 6/60 abnormal (“boxer's encephalopathy”) NA
Moriyasuw31 EEG NA 2/10 abnormal (“slightly slow patterns”) NA
Nesarajahw32 EEG Not stated 30/50 abnormal v 6/75 controls Not stated
Beaussartw33 EEG Not stated 25/52 rhythm and slow posterior waves Not stated
Blonsteinw34 EEG NA 0/29 abnormal NA
Blonsteinw34 Neurological NA 0/29 abnormal NA
Pampusw35 EEG NA 11/26 abnormal after 3 bouts v 34/116 before any bouts Not stated
Pampusw35 Neurological NA 42/175 abnormal NA
Blonsteinw36 EEG NA 4/24 abnormal after bout but returned to normal rapidly NA

NA=not applicable; CSF=cerebrospinal fluid; CSP=cavum septum pellucidum; CT=computed tomography; EEG=electroencephalography; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; SPECT=single photon emission computerised tomography.

*t tests (or equivalent non-parametric tests).

†Analysis of variance.