Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2007 Mar 12;36(4):1110–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.034

Table 4.

Calculated Responses

ROI %CMRO2a Mb nc nCO2d
V1 30.9 ± 7.5** 0.112 ± 0.042** 2.45 ± 0.42** 3.52 ± 0.99
PICORE – BOLD (c.c = 0.5) 22.3 ± 6.8 0.092 ± 0.03** 3.18 ± 0.89 3.79 ± 1.21
PICORE – CBF (c.c. = 0.4) 23.9 ± 7.8 0.072 ± 0.01 3.01 ± 0.59* 3.51 ± 0.87
PICORE – CBF (c.c = 0.5) 22.5 ± 7.9 0.067 ± 0.019 3.45 ± 0.94 3.61 ± 1.00
PICORE – CBF (c.c. = 0.6) 18.4 ± 9.9* 0.065 ± 0.024 4.37 ± 2.14* 3.57 ± 1.17
QUIPSS II – CBF (c.c = 0.5) 26.7 ± 9.0 0.064 ± 0.01 3.16 ± 0.81 3.74 ± 1.18
a

Fractional change in CMRO2 with activation computed as the average (±SD) of individual subject CMRO2 changes

b

BOLD calibration factor estimated from the hypercapnia experiment. Reported as the average (±SD) of individual subject M calculations.

c

index of CBF/CMRO2 coupling, the ratio of %CBF to %CMRO2. Reported as the inverse of the average individual subject 1/n values.

d

index of CBF/CO2 coupling, the ratio of %CBF to the fractional change in end-tidal

*

significant difference with the PICORE-CBF (r=0.5) data with p<0.05

**

significant difference with the PICORE-CBF (r=0.5) data with p<0.01