Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2007 Mar 24;369(9566):1016–1026. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60461-9

Table 3.

Treatment failure

Year
1 2 3 4 5 6
Any reason
Valproate
 Number at risk 165 114  61  40  14   4
 Percentage still on drug (95% CI)  74 (68 to 79)  67 (61 to 73)  61 (54 to 68)  60 (52 to 67)  58 (50 to 66)  58 (50 to 66)
Lamotrigine
 Number at risk 152 106  60  29  10   3
 Difference in percentage without failure compared with valproate (95% CI)  −5 (−13 to 3)  −6 (−15 to 3)  −6 (−16 to 4) −10 (−21 to 1)  −8 (−20 to 3)  −8 (20 to 3)
Topiramate
 Number at risk 129  91  55  35  13   1
 Difference in percentage without failure compared with valproate (95% CI) −14 (−23 to −6) −14 (−23 to −5) −11 (−21 to −2) −11 (−21 to −1) −13 (−24 to −2) −16 (−29 to −4)
For adverse events
Valproate
 Percentage without failure (95% CI)  84 (79 to 89)  82 (77 to 87)  79 (73 to 85)  79 (73 to 85)  79 (73 to 85)  79 (73 to 85)
Lamotrigine
 Difference in percentage without failure compared with valproate (95% CI)   3 (−3 to 10)   5 (−2 to 11)   7 (−1 to 14)   7 (−1 to 14)   7 (−1 to 14)   7 (−1 to 14)
Topiramate
 Difference in percentage without failure compared with valproate (95% CI)  −9 (−16 to −1) −10 (−18 to −2)  −8 (−16 to 1)  −8 (−16 to 1)  −8 (−16 to 1) −14 (−30 to 1)
For inadequate seizure control
Valproate
 Percentage without failure (95% CI)  90 (87 to 94)  87 (82 to 91)  84 (79 to 89)  84 (79 to 89)  84 (79 to 89)  84 (79 to 89)
Lamotrigine
 Difference in percentage without failure compared with valproate (95% CI)  −7 (−13 to −1) −10 (−17 to −3) −13 (−21 to −4) −15 (−24 to −6) −15 (−24 to −6) −15 (−24 to −6)
Topiramate
 Difference in percentage without failure compared with valproate (95% CI)  −6 (−12 to 0)  −5 (−12 to 2)  −5 (−12 to 3)  −5 (−12 to 3)  −5 (−12 to 3)  −9 (−19 to 2)