Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2007 Aug 15;373(2):367–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.069

Table 4.

Data collection and phasing statistics for SeMet-labeled SurA(ΔP2)/C-peptide.

Data collection statistics

Wavelength (Å) Resolution (highest shell) (Å) Completeness (%) Rsyma f′ f″
0.9790 48.55–3.30 (3.42–3.30) 99.9 (100) 0.189 (0.767) −8.7 5.9
0.9794 48.31–3.80 (3.94–3.80) 99.8 (100) 0.123 (0.566) −10.6 3.6
0.9950 48.61–3.60 (3.73–3.60) 99.8 (100) 0.115 (0.533) −3.6 0c

Diffraction Ratios and Phasing Statistics

Anomalous Diffraction Ratios Anomalous Phasing Power

Wavelength (Å) λ1 λ2 λ3 λ1 λ2 λ3

 λ1=0.9790 0.1032 0.1186 0.1046 1.9 0.3 0.9
 λ2=0.9794 0.1137 0.1540 0.9 0.9
 λ3=0.9950 0.0790 0c

Figure of Merit<m>

Resolution (Å) 14.2–9.0 9.03–7.0 7.08–6.0 6.01–5.3 5.31–4.8 4.81–4.4 4.43–4.1 4.13-4.0 overall
3 8 1 1 1 3 3

<m> 0.83 0.82 0.78 0.73 0.70 0.66 0.58 0.52 0.67
a

Rsym = Σ|Ihkl − <Ihkl>|/Σ<Ihkl> where Ihkl = single value of measured intensity of hkl reflection, and <Ihkl> = mean of all measured value intensity of hkl reflection. Bijvoet measurements were treated as independent reflections for the MAD phasing data sets.

b

Values of f′ and f″ were initially estimated from an EXAFS scan and refined in SOLVE26.

c

Taken as the reference for phasing in SOLVE.