Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Dev Sci. 2001;5(4):225–236. doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0504_04

Table 4.

Intervention Effect on the Trajectory of School Bonding

Model 3: Intervention as Covariates
Fixed Effect Coefficient SE t-Ratio
For Base Rate at Age 18, π0i
 Intercept, β00 2.725 0.041 66.321****
 Full Intervention Versus Control, β01 0.153 0.063 2.415**
 Late Intervention Versus Control, β02 0.065 0.056 1.147
For Rate of Change at Age 18, π1i
 Intercept, β10 −0.016 0.028 −0.576
 Full Intervention Versus Control, β11 0.087 0.042 2.053**
 Late Intervention Versus Control, β12 0.025 0.038 0.659
For Acceleration, π2i
 Intercept, β20 0.004 0.005 0.753
 Full Intervention Versus Control, β21 0.017 0.008 2.072**
 Late Intervention Versus Control, β22 0.006 0.007 0.780

Random Effect Estimate χ2 df

Var (π0i) = τ00 0.178 1259.577**** 602
Var (π1i) = τ11 0.032 772.305**** 602
Var (π2i) = τ22 0.001 725.895**** 602
Var (eti) = σ2 0.148

Deviance 4116.822
Number of Estimated Parameters 16
*

p < 0.1.

**

p < 0.05.

***

p < 0.01.

****

p < 0.001.