Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Jun 12;571(2-3):129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.06.001

Table 2.

Effect of morphine, THC or low-dose combination treatment on Emax and EC50 values of cannabinoid CB1 receptor-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding

Region Vehicle Control Drug Treated
Spinal Cord Emax (% Con) EC50 (nM) Emax (% Con) EC50 (nM)
Morphine 100 ± 18 93 ±14 106 ± 9.4 51 ± 20
THC 100 ± 11 40 ± 4.8 50 ± 6.4a 190 ± 45
Combo 100 ± 21 57 ± 9.7 89 ± 10 50 ± 17
Periaqueductal Gray Emax (% Con) EC50 (nM) Emax (% Con) EC50 (nM)

Morphine 100 ± 8.7 219 ± 42 103 ± 14 273 ± 34
THC 100 ± 4.8 148 ± 41 73 ± 6.6a 295 ± 95
Combo 100 ± 16 215 ± 67 91 ± 7.5 157 ± 31

Membranes were incubated with 0.1 nM [35S]GTPγS, 30 μM GDP and varying concentrations of WIN55,1212-2, as described in Methods. Data are Emax and EC50 values derived from the concentration-effect curves shown Fig. 2.

a

Significantly different from vehicle control by Bonferoni-adjusted Student's t-test.