Table 2.
Effect of morphine, THC or low-dose combination treatment on Emax and EC50 values of cannabinoid CB1 receptor-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding
Region | Vehicle Control | Drug Treated | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spinal Cord | Emax (% Con) | EC50 (nM) | Emax (% Con) | EC50 (nM) |
Morphine | 100 ± 18 | 93 ±14 | 106 ± 9.4 | 51 ± 20 |
THC | 100 ± 11 | 40 ± 4.8 | 50 ± 6.4a | 190 ± 45 |
Combo | 100 ± 21 | 57 ± 9.7 | 89 ± 10 | 50 ± 17 |
Periaqueductal Gray | Emax (% Con) | EC50 (nM) | Emax (% Con) | EC50 (nM) |
| ||||
Morphine | 100 ± 8.7 | 219 ± 42 | 103 ± 14 | 273 ± 34 |
THC | 100 ± 4.8 | 148 ± 41 | 73 ± 6.6a | 295 ± 95 |
Combo | 100 ± 16 | 215 ± 67 | 91 ± 7.5 | 157 ± 31 |
Membranes were incubated with 0.1 nM [35S]GTPγS, 30 μM GDP and varying concentrations of WIN55,1212-2, as described in Methods. Data are Emax and EC50 values derived from the concentration-effect curves shown Fig. 2.
Significantly different from vehicle control by Bonferoni-adjusted Student's t-test.