Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 16;104(43):17186–17191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703706104

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The interaction between cue repetition and task in the fMRI data. (a) In yellow, regions showing an increased response for the reappearance of the cue in the WM condition and a decreased response in the mere repetition condition, compared with when the cue did not reappear. The SPM thresholds were set at P < 0.001, uncorrected, with clusters >15 mm3 overlaid on axial and coronal views of a T1 single-subject template image. (b) The graphs depict the responses (estimated effect size) of three regions across the different conditions. The coordinates in MNI space and the anatomical labels for the regions are written above the graphs. The asterisks indicate significant simple effects (invalid + valid vs. neutral) (P < 0.05). L, left; R, right; SFG/FEF, superior frontal gyrus; SMG, supramarginal gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus.