Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 17;104(43):17234–17238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707753104

Table 1.

Assessment of face recognition in four developmental prosopagnosics

Test Correct responses (response times, ms)
Controls G.R. C.B. H.V. J.S.
Benton Face Recognition 45.4 40 31 40 40
Warrington Face Memory 44 (1,778) 36(4,037) 37*(4,573) 41 (3,853) 32(1,961)
Faces upright 63.3 (1,146) 62 (3,054) 63 (3,458) 63 (2,840) 58(3,232)
Faces inverted 62.0 (1,526) 64 (4,302) 57(5,400) 62 (3,640) 58*(3,641)
Shoes upright 62.5 (978) 63 (2,074) 63 (2,836) 64 (1,757) 64 (2,456)
Shoes inverted 62.8 (1,069) 62 (2,082) 63 (2,559) 64 (1,689) 64 (1,651*)
Face parts upright 62.7 (1,562) 59(4,165) 55(4,539) 60*(4,446) 63 (2,748)
Face parts inverted 62.0 (1,755) 58*(3,809) 51(5,067) 63 (4,130) 60 (2,690)
House parts upright 62.7 (1,192) 64 (2,191) 64 (2,966) 62 (1,703) 63 (1,278)
House parts inverted 63.2 (1,132) 64 (2,324) 63 (3,061) 62 (1,593) 64 (1,422*)

For a description of the task see Methods. Comparisons of prosopagnosic cases with control group were calculated by z-scores.

*, P < 0.05;

†, P < 0.01;

‡, P < 0.001.

Control group: Warrington Face Memory, n = 25 (18–27 yr); faces and shoes, n = 11 (18–28 yr); face and house parts, n = 21 (18–29 yr). Maximum possible score for Benton Face Recognition was 54, for Warrington Face Memory 50, and for the other tests 64.