Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 25;104(27):11352–11357. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704695104

Table 1.

Effect of MMR on ssOT

ssOligo msh2/WT msh3/WT msh6/WT mlh1/WT msh2/msh3 msh2/msh6 msh2/mlh1
COD(1) leading 37* 3.5* 1.9 22* 10* 19* 1.7
DCOD(1) leading 260* 4.1* 4.3* 270* 62* 59* 0.9
NC(1) leading 840* 3.6 44* 500* 240* 19* 1.7
DNC(1) leading 380* 1.6 39* 290* 240* 9.8* 1.3
COD(1) lagging 52* 2.4 7.5* 37* 22* 7.0* 1.4
DCOD(1) lagging 440* 2.6* 6.3* 180* 170* 69* 2.4
NC(1) lagging 440* 0.6 18* 300* 680* 25* 1.5
DNC(1) lagging 810* 1.0 82* 650* 820* 9.9* 1.3
Average 410 2.4 25 280 280 27 1.5
COD(7) leading 42* 62* 1.2* 27* 0.7* 34* 1.6
DCOD(7) leading 85* 54* 2.1 32* 1.6 41* 2.7*
NC(7) leading 230* 330* 11* 41* 0.7 20* 5.5*
DNC(7) leading 46* 39* 1.8 15* 1.2 25* 3.1*
COD(7) lagging 140* 180* 4.2* 16* 0.8 33* 8.5*
DCOD(7) lagging 73* 77* 2.0 4.2* 0.9 37* 17*
NC(7) lagging 17* 14* 1.2 2.8 1.2 14* 5.9*
DNC(7) lagging 12* 11* 1.3 9.2* 1.1 9.4* 1.3
Average 80 96 3.1 18 1 27 5.7

For a given ssOligo, the normalized transformation values (Fig. 2) were used to compute the indicated ratios.

*A ratio in which the standard deviations of the denominator and numerator do not overlap; we consider such ratios to be different from 1.