Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Biol Chem. 2007 Feb 20;31(2):92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2007.02.008

Table 1.

R2 of Naef and Magnasco model (Naef and Magnasco, 2003) (NM) and the position-dependent secondary-structure attenuated affinity model (PPSA) for the seven data sets used in this study. Results presented as average R2 ± SD.

Data set naa npb NM PSAAc
Latin Square 42 248152 PM 0.17±0.009 0.184±0.010
248152 MM 0.40±0.009 0.416±0.009
Choe (Choe et al., 2005) 6 195994 PM 0.20±0.022 0.216±0.025
195994 MM 0.46±0.017 0.49±0.017
Leukemia (Armstrong et al., 2002) 72 201800 PM 0.49±0.063 0.51±0.062
201800 MM 0.60±0.036 0.61±0.035
Etoposide response (Fodor et al., 2006) 60 496468 PM 0.05±0.040 0.06±0.040
496468 MM 0.11±0.062 0.12±0.062
BK knockout (Meredith et al., 2006;Pyott et al., 2006) 20 496468 PM 0.09±0.035 0.10±0.036
496468 MM 0.29±0.050 0.30±0.049
Splicing microarray (Sugnet et al., 2006) 75 505916 PM 0.30±0.062 0.31±0.063
Malaria (Le Roch et al., 2003) 17 173262 PM 0.36±0.043 0.38±0.043
a

na: number of chips.

b

np: number of probes.

c

The differences in R2 between NM and PSAA are all statistically significant (P < 10-3) using paired one-sided Wilcoxon test.