Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 6;51(10):3612–3616. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00590-07

TABLE 1.

Disposition of subjects

Subject disposition No. (%) of subjects in indicated treatment group:
Ceftaroline Standard therapy
Subjects randomized 67 33
    Treated (MITT population) 67 (100.0) 32 (97.0)
    Not treated 0 (0.0) 1 (3.0)
Subjects completing study through EOT 65 (97.0) 29 (87.9)
Subjects completing study through TOC 61 (91.0) 28 (84.8)
Subjects completing study through LFU 59 (88.1) 26 (78.8)
Subjects terminating from study before LFU 8 (11.9) 7 (21.2)
Primary reason for early discontinuation of study drug or withdrawal from study
    Randomized, did not receive study drug 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3)
    At request of subject, investigator, or sponsora 1 (12.5) 0 (0.0)
    Withdrew consent 2 (25.0) 2 (28.6)
    Lost to follow-up 3 (37.5) 1 (14.3)
    Noncompliance with study drug 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3)
    Unsatisfactory response 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3)
    ≥100% increase of baseline creatinine 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3)
    QTc interval of >500 msb 1 (12.5) 0 (0.0)
    Other adverse eventc 1 (12.5) 0 (0.0)
Subjects in cMITT population 67 (100.0) 32 (97.0)
Subjects in mMITT population 51 (76.1) 27 (81.8)
Subjects in CE population 61 (91.0) 27 (81.8)
Subjects in ME population 42 (62.7) 21 (63.6)
a

Postrandomization, the subject was determined to have met the exclusion criterion of a seizure history and was withdrawn at the request of the sponsor.

b

Subsequent centrally read ECGs showed the baseline QTc's (Bazett's correction) to be 470, 463, and 448 msec, with a study day 3 predose QTc (Bazett) of 501 msec.

c

Recurrence of infection, which was recorded as an SAE.