Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 1;57(537):291–295.

Table 2.

Adherence to lifestyle measures and barriers for compliance with diet and exercise recommendations.

D n (%)a H n (%)b D + H n (%)c Total n (%)d
Patients not on diet regimen 68 (69.4) 74 (62.2) 69 (59.0) 212 (63.5)

Barriers to diet
 Unwilling 33 (48.5) 35 (47.3) 35 (50.0) 103 (48.6)
 Difficulty adhering to a diet different from that of rest of family 18 (26.7) 25 (33.8) 21 (30.0) 64 (30.2)
 Social gathering 10 (14.7) 10 (13.5) 9 (12.9) 29 (13.7)
 No advice 4 (5.9) 3 (4.1) 2 (2.9) 9 (4.2)
 Workload 3 (4.4) 2 (2.7) 2 (2.9) 7 (3.3)
 Other causes 4 (5.9) 3 (4.1) 8 (10.8) 15 (6.9)

Patients on no exercise programme 63 (64.3) 76 (63.9) 77 (65.8) 216 (64.7)
Barriers to exercise
 Lack of time 26 (41.3) 42 (53.9) 18 (23.4) 85 (39.0)e
 Other diseases 16 (25.4) 20 (26.3) 41 (53.2) 77 (35.6)e
 Weather 21 (33.3) 20 (26.3) 19 (24.7) 60 (27.8)
 No exercise partner 3 (4.8) 3 (3.9) 2 (2.6) 8 (3.7)
 Cultural difficulties for women 1 (1.6) 3 (3.9) 4 (5.2) 8 (3.7)
 Other causes 2 (3.2) 1 (1.3) 3 (3.9) 6 (2.8)

D = type 2 diabetes. H = hypertension.

a

n = 98.

b

n = 119.

c

n = 117.

d

n = 334.

e

P<0.05.