Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Jan 9;62(6):553–564. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.019

Table 1.

Prevalence estimates of personality disorders in the three previous non-clinical US population studies that used validated structured interviews

Study
Lenzenweger et al., 1997 Samuels et al., 2002 Crawford et al., 2005

Instrument IPDE* IPDE* SCID-II
Nomenclature DSM-III-R DSM-IV DSM-IV
Location Ithaca, NY USA Baltimore, MD USA Upstate New York, USA
Sample University students Community sample Community sample
Cluster A
 Paranoid 1.0 0.7 5.1
 Schizoid 1.0 0.9 1.7
 Schizotypal 1.6 0.6 1.1
Cluster B
 Antisocial 0.6 4.1 1.2
 Borderline 1.3 0.5 3.9
 Histrionic 2.9 0.2 0.9
 Narcissistic 2.7 0.0 2.2
Cluster C
 Avoidant 1.0 1.8 6.4
 Dependent 0.6 0.1 0.8
 Obsessive-Compulsive 1.3 § 4.7
 Passive-Aggressive 1.6 § §
Any PD 11.0 9.0 15.7
(n) (1646/258) (742) (644)
*

International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE) DSM-III-R (Loranger et al 1994) and DSM-IV (Loranger 1999) versions

Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders (SCID-II) (First et al 1994)

Antisocial PD and histrionic PD prevalence estimates were based on self-report data.

§

Ellipses indicate not applicable

Includes DSM-III-R sadistic PD as well as personality disorder “not otherwise specified” based on the IPDE

A two-stage case identification approach was used in which all 1,646 respondents were administered screening questions based on the IPDE and all screened positives plus a probability sample of screened negatives were administered the IPDE (n = 258).