Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 8;45(10):3263–3269. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00836-07

TABLE 2.

Numbers of isolates yielding positive screening results as determined by the Etest macromethod and numbers of hGISA isolates detected by the vPAP and/or tPAP methods

MRSA collection no., name, yr (no. of isolates/no. of patients)a No. of isolates yielding positive screening results by the Etest macromethod
hGISAe
V and T ≥ 8 or T ≥ 12 (mg/liter)b T = 8 (mg/liter)c T ≥ 8 (mg/liter)d No. of isolates (%) No. of patients (%)
1, H1 Q4, 1998 (188/169) 7 8 15 10 (5.3) 10 (5.9)
2, N/S study, 1999 (714/682) 74 62 136 81 (11) 81 (12)
3, EARSS, 1999-2003 (1,580/1,507) 15 31 46 39 (2.5) 39 (2.6)
4, NMRSARL, 2000-2003 (97/59) 19 11 30 28* (29) 22* (37)
5, H1 Q2, 2003 (330/303) 18 7 25 16 (4.9) 16 (5.3)
6, H1 Q4, 2004 (280/270) 6 0 6 4 (1.4) 4 (1.5)
Total (3,189/2,990) 139 119 258 178 (5.6) 172 (5.8)
a

See Table 1, footnote a.

b

Cutoff values of ≥8 mg/liter for both vancomycin (V) and teicoplanin (T) or ≥12 mg/liter for teicoplanin alone.

c

Cutoff value of 8 mg/liter for teicoplanin (T) alone.

d

Cutoff value of ≥8 mg/liter for teicoplanin (T).

e

*, hGISA isolates comprised of 27 hGISA isolates from 22 patients and 1 isolate from an environmental source. Single isolates were recovered from 19 patients; two isolates were recovered from 1 patient, and three isolates were recovered from 2 patients.