Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2007 Jan 10;367(4):1007–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.01.013

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of the relative orientation between L11-NTD and L11-CTD among the solution structure (a), the structure of L11 in the complex with 58 nt RNA fitted into cryo-EM density of 70S ribosome (1JQS)16 (b) and the crystal structure of L11 in the complex with 58 nt RNA (1MMS) 12 (c). The backbone atoms for L11-CTD (residues 75–140, excluding the flexible RBL) have been superimposed for the best fit. The principal components of inertia tensors of L11-NTD of the solution structure, the cryo-EM structure and the crystal structure were calculated using the MolMol program and are shown in magenta. The N- and C- termini are indicated.