Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Protein Expr Purif. 2007 Apr 25;55(1):53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2007.04.013

Table 3.

Estimation Of The Impact That Individual Factors Have On The Final Activity Improvement Observed with 237Δ-TEV Protease.a

Coding sequenceb Protein Lac repressor promoter Expression Temperature Induction Method RILP codon adaptation Multiplicative Fold Improvementc Activity Initial/Finalμmol/hr/Ld
 Starting Conditione Full Length lacIQ 25 °C Auto -
 Alternatef 237Δ lacI 37 °C IPTG +

MHT 1.7 1.3 1.6 0.4 1.3 5 36 / 169
HT 2.3 3.9 2.7 0.3 1.3 32 4.8 / 154
GT 2.1 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.4 7 6.5 / 77
a

The improvement was quantified by assay of TEV protease activity in cell lysates.

b

Coding sequence for the TEV variant placed into the plasmid shown in Figure 2.

c

The multiplicative fold improvement is the product of the factors of all alternate conditions that led to higher activity.

d

The initial activity is from the full length TEV protease and the final activity is from the optimized expression conditions.

e

The starting condition was expression of the full-length TEV protease at 25 °C using auto-induction medium, no RILP codon adaptation and lacIq control of LacI expression.

f

The initial change to alternate conditions was incorporation of the 237Δ truncation. Other alternate conditions leading to higher activity are shown in bold.