Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 24;8:308. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-308

Table 1.

Overview of gene retrotransposition analysis for eight vertebrates

Species Number of genes * Number of PRs PR matches retrotransposed TE ** PR overlaps pseudogene annotation FLE ≤ 0.8 *** Number of retro- pseudogenes (RψGs) PRs passing local gene order test Matching Refseq mRNA or Unigene consensus ****
Human 22219 631 (3%) 78 (12%) 36 (6%) 504 2493 545 145/631 (23%)
Chimp 20980 476 (2%) 17 (4%) 5 (1%) 339 1889 ----
Dog 18199 409 (2%) 18 (4%) 25 (6%) 363 3505 ----
Cow 23147 790 (3%) 46 (6%) 104 (13%) 479 1996 ----
Mouse 25021 663 (3%) 31 (5%) 75 (11%) 518 2969 533 58/663 (9%)
Rat 22157 567 (3%) 21 (4%) 62 (11%) 492 4520 ----
Chicken 17707 321 (2%) 15 (5%) 26 (8%) 267 720 ----
Tetraodon 28005 227 (1%) 4 (2%) 10 (4%) 203 644 ----

* The number of gene annotations (both those labelled 'known' and 'novel') for the genome version downloaded from Ensembl [[15]; see Methods for details].

** TE = transposable element ; see Methods for details.

*** FLE = fraction of largest exon ; see Methods for details.

**** Number of PRs with complete Refseq mRNAs or complete Unigene consensus sequences (percentage of these in brackets); see Methods for details. PRs have significantly much less mapping of this transcription information than the whole annotated proteome for these organisms.