Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;60(3):295–304. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602308

Table 2.

Characteristics of different thresholds for the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and waist hip ratio (WHR), corresponding to a 30%, 40% and 50% screening of the population. Subjects aged 40 to 64 years who were not treated for diabetes. The D.E.S.I.R. Study.

MEN WOMEN
threshold sensitivity specificity LR1 (se+sp)/2 threshold sensitivity specificity LR (se+sp)/2
screening with a blood test 30% of the population
BMI 27 kg/m2 77 % 69 % 2.5 73 % 26 kg/m2 77 % 71 % 2.6 74 %
Waist 96 cm 74 % 71 % 2.5 72 % 83 cm 82 % 69 % 2.6 75 %
WHR 0.96 66 % 70 % 2.2 68 % 0.83 77 % 70 % 2.5 73 %
screening with a blood test 40% of the population
BMI 26 kg/m2 83 % 57 % 1.9 70 % 25 kg/m2 86 % 63 % 2.4 75 %
Waist 93 cm 83 % 59 % 2.0 71 % 80 cm 86 % 60 % 2.2 73 %
WHR 0.94 81 % 59 % 2.0 70 % 0.81 77 % 60 % 1.9 68 %
screening with a blood test screening 50% of the population
BMI 25 kg/m2 89 % 44 % 1.6 66 % 24 kg/m2 86 % 53 % 1.8 70 %
Waist 90 cm 87 % 47 % 1.6 67 % 77 cm 86 % 49 % 1.7 68 %
WHR 0.93 81 % 53 % 1.7 67 % 0.79 86 % 48 % 1.7 67 %
optimal thresholds, maximizing the average of the sensitivity and specificity
BMI 27 kg/m2 77 % 69 % 2.5 73 % 25 kg/m2 86 % 63 % 2.4 75 %
Waist 97 cm 72 % 74 % 2.8 73 % 85 cm 77 % 74 % 3.0 76 %
WHR 0.95 77 % 65 % 2.2 71 % 0.83 77 % 70 % 2.5 73 %
1

LR: likelihood ratio