Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;60(3):295–304. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602308

Table 4.

Characteristics of different thresholds for the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and waist hip ratio (WHR), corresponding to a 30%, 40% and 50% screening of the population. Subjects aged 40 to 64 years who were not treated for dyslipidemia. The D.E.S.I.R. Study.

MEN WOMEN
threshold sensitivity specificity LR1 (se+sp)/2 threshold sensitivity specificity LR (se+sp)/2
screening with a blood test 30% of the population
BMI 27 kg/m2 56 % 72 % 2.0 64 % 26 kg/m2 54 % 73 % 2.0 63 %
Waist 96 cm 54 % 74 % 2.1 64 % 83 cm 65 % 72 % 2.3 68 %
WHR 0.96 49 % 74 % 1.8 61 % 0.83 67 % 74 % 2.5 70 %
screening with a blood test 40% of the population
BMI 26 kg/m2 69 % 61 % 1.8 65 % 25 kg/m2 62 % 65 % 1.8 64 %
Waist 93 cm 65 % 63 % 1.8 64 % 79 cm 76 % 60 % 1.9 68 %
WHR 0.94 63 % 63 % 1.7 63 % 0.81 74 % 64 % 2.0 69 %
screening with a blood test screening 50% of the population
BMI 25 kg/m2 79 % 47 % 1.5 63 % 24 kg/m2 78 % 55 % 1.7 66 %
Waist 90 cm 79 % 51 % 1.6 65 % 76 cm 83 % 48 % 1.6 65 %
WHR 0.93 70 % 57 % 1.6 63 % 0.79 81 % 52 % 1.7 66 %
optimal thresholds, maximizing the average of the sensitivity and specificity
BMI 26 kg/m2 69 % 61 % 1.8 65 % 24 kg/m2 78 % 55 % 1.7 66 %
Waist 91 cm 74 % 55 % 1.6 65 % 81 cm 71 % 66 % 2.1 69 %
WHR 0.94 63 % 63 % 1.7 63 % 0.83 67 % 74 % 2.5 70 %
1

LR: likelihood ratio: sensitivity/(1-specificity)