Skip to main content
. 2003 Oct;16(4):713–729. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.4.713-729.2003

TABLE 3.

Commercial assays used to identify E. histolytica

Assay Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Manufacturer
Antigen detection
    TechLab E. histolytica II 100a ∼95a TechLab, Blacksburg, Va.
    TechLab Entamoeba test 80b-95c 99b-93c TechLab, Blacksburg, Va.
    ProSpecT Entamoeba histolytica microplate assay 90.3d 97.7d Alexon-Trend Inc., Ramsey, Minn.
    Entamoeba CELISA-PATH KPo (94) KP (100) Cellabs Pty Ltd., Brookvale, Australia
    Entamoeba-CELISA-Screen KP (87.7) KP (98.3) Cellabs Pty Ltd., Brookvale, Australia
    Wampole E. histolytica Test KP (94.7)e KP Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.
    Merlin Optimun S ELISA 100f Merlin Diagnostika, Bernheim-Hersel, Germany
    Triage parasite panel 68.3g 100g BIOSITE Diagnostics, San Diego, Calif.
83.3h 100h
96i 99.1i
    Amibiase Ag EIA NPp NP Biotrin Int., Dublin, Ireland
Antibody detection
    IHA Cellognost Amoebiasis 72.2j-100k 99.1j-90.9k Behring Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany
    Amibiasis Serology Microwell EIA 92.5l 91.3l LMD Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad Calif.
    BLA-Bichrolatex-Amibe 98.3m 96.1m Fumouze Diagnostics, Levallois-Perret, France
    IHA 93.4m 97.5m Fumouze Diagnostics, Levallois-Perret, France
    The Melotest Amoebiasis EIA NAn NAn Melotec, S.A., Barcelona, Spain
a

Compared to culture and isoenzyme analysis (78).

b

Compared to culture (85).

c

Compared to zymodeme analysis (85).

d

Compared to microscopy (99).

e

Correlation to zymodeme analysis.

f

Correlation of TechLab E. histolytica for detection of E. histolytica, but not E. dispar (161).

g

Compared to ProSpecT ELISA (160).

h

Compared to microscopy (160).

i

Compared to O&P and permanent stains (67).

j

Reference 91.

k

Reference 161 (with use of E. histolytica antigen detection as the reference standard).

l

Reference 204.

m

Reference 180.

n

Reference 182. NA, not available.

o

KP, kit prospectus.

p

NP, not published data.