Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 20;15(12):1413–1421. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0254-7

Table 4.

Dying in an institution or at home: perspective of bereaved relative

  Place of death P value t test P value χ2 test
In institution (N = 29) At home (N = 34)
Number of days patient stayed at place of death [mean (SD)] 7 (6) 59 (35) 0.000
Number of transfers [mean (SD)] 1.9 (1.7) 1.2 (1.3) 0.047
Number of disciplines involved with patient [mean (SD)] 6.1 (2.3) 5.8 (1.9) 0.64
Number of clinical specialties involved with patient [mean (SD)] 2.2 (1.2) 1.8 (0.8) 0.011
Patient [n (%)]
 Was fatigued 22 (79) 29 (88) 0.33
 Had loss of appetite 22 (76) 30 (88) 0.20
 Had pain 20 (69) 29 (85) 0.12
 Had dyspnoea 18 (62) 17 (52) 0.40
 Had mouth or mucous problems 18 (62) 16 (49) 0.28
 Was incontinent 20 (69) 13 (38) 0.015
 Had nausea 9 (32) 10 (30) 0.88
 Had bedsores 5 (17) 13 (38) 0.07
 Was confused 14 (48) 10 (29) 0.12
 Suffered from anxiety 12 (41) 5 (15) 0.021
 Was depressed 3 (10) 2 (6) 0.54
Evaluation of care during the last 3 days of life [n (%)]
 Assistance with personal care was sufficient 27 (93) 32 (94) 0.87
 Nursing care was sufficienta 26 (90) 33 (97) 0.23
 Relative was involved in decision-making 25 (89) 33 (97) 0.22
 Relative was sufficiently involved in decision-making 24 (89) 33 (100) 0.049
 Patient might have disagreed with medical decision(s) 4 (15) 1 (3) 0.10
 Relative disagreed with medical decision(s) 7 (24) 7 (21) 0.78
 It had been clear that patient was dying 18 (67) 26 (79) 0.29

aIncluding patients who did not need professional nursing care