Skip to main content
. 1997 Apr 29;94(9):4354–4359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4354

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The effect of mutations in the GluR-B Q/R and R/G site RNA on editing activity. (A) Editing activity of Q/R site mutations. (B) Editing activity of R/G site mutations. The potential secondary structure of the 58 nucleotide R/G site substrate and a similar 323 nucleotide Q/R site substrate are shown on the top of A and B. Two base mismatches at A13 and G20 of Q/R site, or A11 and G15 of the R/G site RNA were mutated to evaluate their importance for editing efficiency by rRED1. Editing efficiency was determined as in Fig. 3B. Mutations are denoted by the mismatched nucleotide and its position followed by its potential base paired nucleotide and its position. A13C309 and A11C47 are the wild-type substrates for Q/R and R/Q sites. In G13C309, nucleotide 13 of the Q/R site RNA is replaced by G. In A13U309, nucleotide 309 of Q/R site RNA is replaced by U. A13U309/G20C302 is a double mutation in which nucleotides 309 and 302 of the Q/R site RNA are replaced by U and C, respectively. The same nomenclature applies to the R/G site RNA mutations.