Table 3.

Comparative LOD scores in candidate regions using SNP-GWS and STR-GWS data

		SNP-GWS				STR-GWS
CHR	Region	NPL	p value	PAR DOM	PAR REC	NPL	p value	PAR DOM	PAR REC
2	2p22.3	2.25	0.012	1.45	0.20	-0.21	0.600	0.00	0.00
3	3p21.31p14.3	1.95	0.030	0.64	0.68	1.01	0.200	0.00	0.16
4	4p14q12	2.22	0.013	1.38	1.40	1.65	0.050	1.34	1.29
7	7q21.11q21.3	2.59	0.005	1.00	2.01	1.77	0.040	0.48	0.94
11	11q13.5q14.3	2.51	0.006	1.04	0.20	0.99	0.200	0.84	0.20
14	14q21.1q21.3	2.41	0.008	1.03	0.30	0.98	0.200	0.75	0.77

Comparative NPLOD scores and PLOD scores (HLOD) under dominant (PAR DOM) and recessive models (PAR REC) using SNP-GWS and STR-GWS data in candidate regions according to Smith et al [15] (NL: values < 1 in NPLOD or PLOD). Values > 1.00 are highlighted in bold.