Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 24;73(21):6790–6801. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00841-07

TABLE 5.

Test for virulence to tomato

Strain Phylotype Virulence on tomato line
% Wilting at day 30a
Mean AUDPCb
Roma R3034 Hawaii7996 CRA84 BF-Okitsu Mean Roma R3034 Hawaii7996 CRA84 BF-Okitsu Mean
CIR03077 II/4NPB 70.0 A 50.0 A 60.0 A 30.0 AB 55.0 A 53.0 A 16.0 A 10.7 A 12.2 A 6.5 AB 12.1 A 11.4 A
CFBP7013 II/4NPB 60.0 A 25.0 B 50.0 A 50.0 A 20.0 B 42.0 A 12.7 A 6.0 A 8.6 A 10.0 A 4.6 B 9.0 A
CFBP6783 II/4NPB 57.0 A 30.0 B 50.0 A 45.0 A 25.0 B 42.0 A 14.1 A 7.0 A 8.2 A 9.8 A 5.0 B 9.2 A
RS25 II 44.0 A 20.0 B 0.0 B 0.0 B 0.0 B 13.0 B 9.6 AB 3.6 A 0.0 B 0.0 B 0.0 B 2.6 B
CIR03076 I 24.0 B 10.0 B 0.0 B 0.0 B 0.0 B 7.0 B 3.7 B 2.9 A 0.0 B 0.0 B 0.0 B 1.2 B
Meanc 53.0 A 27.0 B 32.0 B 25.0 B 20.0 B 11.2 A 6.0 B 6.6 B 5.2 B 4.3 B
a

Mean percentage of wilted plants (n = 2 replicates, 10 plants per replicate) Assessed on the 30th day After inoculation. Values followed by the same letter in the same column Are not significantly different (Newman-Keuls test [P = 0.05], done on arcsin [square root]-transformed wilt values and on AUDPC values).

b

Mean AUDPC, mean area under the disease progression curve (n = 2). See the text for details on its calculation. Values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (Newman-Keuls test [P = 0.05], done on arcsin [square root]-transformed wilt values and on AUDPC values).

c

Values followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Newman-Keuls test [P = 0.05]).