Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 23;104(44):17500–17505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708710104

Table 1.

Effect of treatment with sulforaphane (broccoli sprout extract) on the erythema induced by UV radiation

Subject Sex Age, yr Reduction in UVR-induced erythema at given UVB radiation dose, %
Mean reduction in erythema, % P value
300 mJ/cm2 400 mJ/cm2 500 mJ/cm2 600 mJ/cm2 700 mJ/cm2 800 mJ/cm2
1 M 53 66.8 32.3 33.1 16.6 48.8 32.1 38.3 0.0029
2 F 32 69.1 −1.4 −5.5 56.5 15.4 8.7 23.8 0.1220
3 F 28 30.1 1.7 1.5 −5.7 22.2 0.4 8.37 0.2102
4 M 41 60.0 107.5 37.1 115.7 58.9 89.5 78.1 0.0016
5 F 29 52.0 72.5 87.0 64.5 26.7 20.9 53.9 0.0038
6 M 48 N/A 61.4 1.1 45.9 11.7 −2.5 23.5 0.1390
37.7 ± 11.2 (± SEM) 0.025

The six subjects (three men and three women) were studied under identical conditions over a 5-day period, as described under Materials and Methods. The pairs of adhesive vinyl templates were applied in the same paraspinal positions on 4 successive days, at 24-h intervals, and erythema index (a*) values were determined with the chromometer on each of the 16 circular (2.0-cm diameter) windows at each session. The means of the last eight values of each set of measurements obtained on 4 days were averaged, and these means were assumed to be the a* values for each spot before UVR (Pre-UVR). Immediately after the last measurements, the subjects were exposed to a range of doses of UV (311 nm), such that the eight pairs of adjacent spots received 100–800 mJ/cm2 in 100 mJ/cm2 increments. Twenty-four hours after UVR, the chromometer a* measurements were repeated (Post-UVR). Only results for the 300–800 mJ/cm2 UVR are shown (see text). On the first 3 days, one of each pair of spots was treated with 25 μl of BSE containing 200–400 nmol SF (in 80% acetone/20% water), and the other received 25 μl of solvent only. The effects of treatment on UVR-induced erythema a* were derived from the change in a* values (Δa*), i.e., (a*Post-UVR − a*Pre-UVR) for BSE and solvent-treated spots, and the percentage change expressed as follows: [(Δa* of treated spot/Δa*of control spot) × 100]. The P values were calculated using a two-sided Student t test and represent the comparison between an individual subject's average percent reduction (i.e., across all UVR doses administered) and no protection (i.e., 0% reduction in erythema). For the purpose of the t test, we assumed the standard deviation associated with no protection (0% reduction) was the same as that calculated for each individual. Consequently, in determining the significance of the mean percent reduction for all six subjects, the standard deviation associated with a no protection value (0%) was assumed to be equal to that of the individual subject responses.