Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar;77(3):359–362. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.074294

Table 2 Muscle strength (predicted) and STS for each group.

Diagnostic group Quadriceps strength (%)† Hamstrings strength (%)† STS (s)†
Extra‐pyramidal 81.3 (36.4), 65.7 (30.6),* 2.5 (0.9),*
(n = 15) −48.8 to 11.6 13.9 to 57.0 0.1 to 1.1‡
Pyramidal 67.2 (30.7),** 55.9 (33.5),** 2.9 (1.2),**
(n = 12) 12.1 to 65.4 19.4 to 67.1 0.2 to 1.7‡
LMN (sensory 53.4 (38.0),** 55.6 (20.5),* 2.9 (0.9),*
intact) (n = 12) 21.5 to 78.3 30.2 to 70.5 −2.1 to 0.6‡
LMN (sensory 87.4 (27.5), 61.4 (22.4),** 2.8 (1.7),*
loss) (n = 18) −45.3 to 0.6 31.4 to 66.2 −0.1 to 1.2‡
Muscle disease 50.6 (30.1),** 55.9 (42.7),** 3.3 (1.6),**
(n = 17) 36.9 to 88.7 32.7 to 85.4 0.4 to 2.2‡
Grouped 68.9 (34.9) 59.2 (30.7) 2.9 (1.3)
neurology
subjects (n = 74)
Control 102.4 (37.0) 103.2 (30.1) 2.0 (0.59)
subjects (n = 32)

LMN, lower motor neuron.

†Values are mean (SD), 95% CI difference; ‡non‐parametric comparisons between groups were used (approximate confidence intervals presented).

*p⩽0.05;**p⩽0.01 when compared to a separately matched control group.