Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar;77(3):402–404. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.067207

Table 1 Comparison of patients with narcolepsy and definite cataplexy with and without detectable CSF hypocretin‐1 levels.

CSF hypocretin‐1 undetectable CSF hypocretin‐1 detectable
n 12 6
Age 37.3±16.4 34.3±8.6
Males 4/12 3/6
ESS score 16.5±3.8 15.2±3.1
SPAS score 10.0±3.5 9.1±1.9
UNS score 23.9±5.9 20.4±6.0
SNS score −35.5±28.5 −5.0±23.0
Severity of cataplexy 1: n = 4, 2: n = 4, 1: n = 3, 2: n = 2,
(see text) 3: n = 4 3: n = 1
Frequency of cataplexy 1: n = 4, 2: n = 3, 1: n = 1, 2: n = 4,
3: n = 5 3: n = 1
Sleep paralysis 6/12 4/6
Hallucinations 6/12 4/6
HLA DQB1*0602 positive 10/11 5/6
Sleep latency on PSG 3.3±2.9 7.3±5.2
Sleep efficiency on PSG (%) 91±8 94±8
⩾2 SOREMPs on MSLT 11/11 3/6
MSL on MSLT 1.4±0.8 min 3.5±1.9 min
MSL on MSLT <5 min 11/11 4/6

ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; MSL, mean sleep latency; SNS, Swiss narcolepsy scale; SOREMPs, sleep onset REM periods; SPAS, Sleep Propensity during Active Situations (see text); UNS, Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale.