Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 27;77(9):1073–1075. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.080390

Table 1 Comparison of clinical, laboratory and MRI features between NMO‐IgG‐positive OSMS and NMO‐IgG‐negative OSMS patients.

NMO‐IgG positive NMO‐IgG negative p Value
Total (n = 14) OSMS (n = 12) OSMS (n = 7)
Age, years (SD) 47 (15) 49 (15) 46 (14) 0.642
Age at onset, years (SD) 36 (13) 37 (13) 36 (13) 0.734
EDSS, median (range) 6.0 (2.0–8.0) 6.0 (3.5–8.0) 6.0 (0–6.5) 0.217
Transverse myelitis 12 (86%) 11 (92%) 5 (71%) 0.523
Permanent complete blindness 7 (50%) 7 (58%) 0 (0%) 0.017
CSF marked pleocytosis (>50 cells/μl) 4 (29%) 4 (33%) 1 (14%) 0.603
OB 2 (14%) 2 (17%) 0 (0%) 0.509
Serum ANA 8/13 (62%) 6/11 (55%) 4 (57%) >0.999
MRI
 Long‐cord lesions (>3VS) 13 (93%) 12 (100%) 4 (57%) 0.036
 Cerebral lesions 6 (43%) 4 (33%) 5 (71%) 0.1698

ANA, anti‐nuclear antibodies; CMS, conventional form of multiple sclerosis; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; OB, oligoclonal IgG bands; OSMS, optic–spinal form of multiple sclerosis; p Value, compared between NMO‐IgG‐positive OSMS and NMO‐IgG‐negative OSMS using Mann–Whitney U test or Fisher's exact test; SMS, spinal form of multiple sclerosis; VS, vertebral segments.

Values in bold are significant (p<0.05).