Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 15;63(11):766–772. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.027151

Table 3 Agreement between (A) air nicotine concentrations and questionnaire reported smoking; and (B) between urinary cotinine and questionnaire reported smoking and air nicotine: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and percentage misclassified.

Gold standard Test method Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV % Misclassified
A Germany
Air nicotine >LOQ* Any questionnaire reported smoking during measurement period (yes/no) 61.4% 95.7% 67.5% 94.5% 8.6%
Air nicotine >LOQ* Daily questionnaire reported smoking during measurement period (yes/no) 55.3% 98.0% 77.8% 94.5% 6.9%
Air nicotine >LOQ* Any questionnaire reported smoking at the child's age 4 years (yes/no) 66.5% 87.2% 42.9% 95.0% 15.2%
Netherlands
Air nicotine >LOQ* Any questionnaire reported smoking during measurement period (yes/no) 77.81% 80.6% 32.6% 96.8% 19.7%
Air nicotine >LOQ* Daily questionnaire reported smoking during measurement period (yes/no) 73.3% 95.6% 66.7% 96.8% 6.7%
Air nicotine >LOQ* Any questionnaire reported smoking at the child's age 4 years (yes/no) 66.7% 91.0% 45.8% 96.0% 11.5%
Sweden
Air nicotine >LOQ* Any questionnaire reported Smoking during measurement period (yes/no) 0% 96.8% 0% 97.4% 5.6%
Air nicotine >LOQ* Any questionnaire reported smoking at the child's age 4 years (yes/no) 55.6% 81.2% 7.2% 98.6% 19.4%
B Germany
Urinary cotinine >LOD† Daily questionnaire reported smoking during measurement period (yes/no) 46.2% 97.6% 75.0% 92.2% 9.2%
Urinary cotinine >LOD† Questionnaire reported smoking during 24 hours prior urine sampling (yes/no) 42.3% 93.0% 47.8% 91.4% 13.7%
Urinary cotinine >LOD† Any questionnaire reported smoking at the child's age 4 years (yes/no) 52.2% 89.5% 49.0% 90.7% 16.5%
Urinary cotinine >LOD† Air nicotine > limit of quantification 50.0% 78.9% 26.5% 91.2% 24.9%

*The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.24 μg/m3.

†The limit of detection (LOD) was 2 ng/ml.

Sensitivity, probability that someone who is truly exposed (gold standard) will be classified as exposed by the test method; specificity, probability that someone who is truly unexposed (gold standard) will be classified as unexposed by the test method; PPV, probability that someone who is classified as exposed by the test method is truly exposed; NPV, probability that someone who is classified as unexposed by the test method is truly unexposed; % misclassified, 100 × (number of subjects for which the two methods disagreed)/total number of subjects.