Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec;63(12):794–801. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020420

Table 1 Sample characteristics (n = 187).

Variables Natural units
Age Mean (SD) 42 (11)
Cumulative days of total compensation (from day of interview)
 Total group Mean (SD) 45 (78), median 14
 Workers with sustainable RTW* Mean (SD) 13 (41), median 0
 Workers with unsustainable RTW† Mean (SD) 44 (56), median 26
 Workers with no RTW‡ Mean (SD) 68 (93), median 32
Gender
 Female 74 (40%)
 Male 113 (60%)
Marital status
 Single 51 (27%)
 Cohabiting 136 (73%)
Education
 Some high school 39 (21%)
 High school completed 91 (49%)
 University or college completed 57 (30%)
Site of injury
 Back 108 (58%)
 Neck and upper extremity 79 (42%)
Employment status
 Full‐time 162 (87%)
 Part‐time 24 (13%)
Collar classification
 White collar 25 (13%)
 Pink 58 (31%)
 Blue collar indoor 47 (25%)
 Blue collar outdoor 25 (13%)
Workplace size (WSIB data)
 <20 employees 17 (10%)
 20–99 employees 30 (17%)
 100–999 employees 56 (32%)
 ⩾1000 employees 41 (23%)
Work accommodation available
 Yes 91 (49%)
 No 94 (51%)
Personal income
 <$20.000 35 (19%)
 $20 000–39 999 79 (44%)
 $40 000–59 999 57 (31%)
 >$60 000 10 (6%)
Family income
 <$40 000 49 (29%)
 $40 000–59 999 54 (32%)
 $60 000–79 999 34 (20%)
 ⩾$80 000 33 (19%)
Work status at time of interview
 RTW—sustainable 73 (39%)
 RTW—unsustainable 22 (12%)
 No RTW 92 (49%)
Claim history past 5 years (yes/no) 66 (35%)/121 (65%)

*Sustainable RTW: being at work at time of interview.

†Unsustainable RTW: not at work at time of interview but at least one attempt to RTW in the interval of injury date–interview date.

‡No attempt to return to work and still not back at work at time of interview.