Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr;63(4):244–249. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020644

Table 2 Comparison of the possible confounding factors among the different exposure categories.

Control Exposed
Total Current work type* Cumulative exposure length, years†
Production Development Maintenance 1–10 11–20 21+
Surveyed, n 212 600 142 114 344 271 295 27
Age (years) 38 (9) 35§ (8) 39 (11) 36§ (6) 32§ (5) 33§ (9) 35§ (5) 44§ (5)
Height (cm) 170 (6) 171 (6) 170 (6) 171 (5) 172§ (6) 171 (6) 171 (6) 170 (6)
BMI (kg/m2) 23 (3) 23 (3) 23 (3) 23 (3) 23 (3) 23 (3) 23 (3) 23 (4)
Smoking habit‡
 Never 58 (27) 157 (26) 32 (23) 45 (40) 80 (23) 84 (31) 64 (22) 7 (26)
 Former 27 (13) 71 (12) 17 (12) 21 (19) 33 (10) 31 (12) 36 (13) 3 (11)
 Current 127 (60) 371 (62) 93 (65) 47 (41) 231 (67) 155 (57) 195 (66) 17 (63)

*Production: toner production; development: machine development; maintenance: machine maintenance.

†Excluding seven subjects with unverified exposure length.

‡One machine development worker with a duration of exposure of 1–10 years was excluded because of unspecified smoking history.

§Significant difference from the mean value in the control group by analysis of variance.

The figures show the means (standard deviation) for age, height, and body mass index (BMI), and the number of subjects (% of the column total) with a current smoking habit.