Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr;63(4):244–249. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020644

Table 4 Comparison of pulmonary function indices by exposure variables.

Pulmonary function indices
FVC/HT2 FEV1/HT2 MEF50/HT2 MEF25/HT2 FEV1%
Mean (SD) b (SE)† Mean (SD) b (SE)† Mean (SD) b (SE)† Mean (SD) b (SE)† Mean (SD) b (SE)†
Control 1480 (170) 1220 (160) 1590 (500) 570 (290) 82.6 (7.0)
Adjusted means and effect of exposure
 Total 1520 (170) 20 (14) 1270 (160) 19 (12) 1660 (470) 12 (38) 620 (270) −4 (19) 83.9 (6.2) 0.1 (0.5)
 Current status*
  Production 1500 (190) 16 (18) 1240 (190) 16 (16) 1570 (490) −18 (50) 580 (300) 5 (25) 82.7 (6.7) 0.1 (0.6)
  Development 1540 (150) 37 (20) 1280 (140) 33 (17) 1660 (450) 15 (54) 620 (270) 17 (27) 83.7 (6.4) 0.2 (0.7)
  Maintenance 1520 (170) 15 (15) 1290 (150) 15 (14) 1700 (460) 27 (42) 630 (250) −16 (22) 84.4 (5.8) 0.1 (0.5)
 Cumulative status
  1–10 1530 (170) 25 (16) 1300 (170) 32 (14)‡ 1690 (480) 23 (44) 680 (310) 33 (22)‡ 84.9 (6.7) 0.6 (0.6)
  11–20 1520 (170) 22 (15) 1260 (150) 15 (13) 1640 (450) 11 (42) 570 (210) −33 (21) 83.2 (5.4) −0.3 (0.5)
  21+ 1420 (150) −36 (34) 1150 (140) −32 (30) 1460 (500) −60 (94) 460 (170) −17 (48) 80.9 (6.7) −0.2 (1.2)
Confounders
 Age −45 (7) −80 (6) −137 (20) −147 (10) −2.9 (0.3)
 Smoking −7 (10) −21 (9) −74 (28) −44 (14) −1.1 (0.4)

*Production: toner production; development: machine development; maintenance: machine maintenance.

†Mean: crude mean; SD: standard deviation; b: regression coefficient; SE: standard error.

‡Significantly negative tendency (p<0.01) associated with exposure duration.

Values shown are the crude arithmetic mean (standard deviation) and independent effect for each exposure category after adjustment for age and smoking status, estimated as regression coefficients in analysis of covariance models. The effects of age and smoking as confounding factors in these regression models are also shown.