Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 23;63(6):422–427. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020974

Table 2 Relation of individual and work unit level effort‐reward imbalance with sedentary lifestyle: adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from logistic regression models with generalised estimating equations (n = 35 918).

n Model 1 Model 2
Women
Individual level
 Low imbalance 8976 1 1
 Intermediate imbalance 11062 0.97 (0.91 to 1.03) 0.97(0.90 to 1.03)
 High imbalance 8749 1.10 (1.03 to 1.18) 1.08 (1.01 to 1.16)
Work unit level
 Low imbalance 9506 1 1
 Intermediate imbalance 9922 0.96 (0.90 to 1.03) 0.95 (0.89 to 1.02)
 High imbalance 9359 1.04 (0.97 to 1.12) 1.00 (0.93 to 1.07)
Men
Individual level
 Low imbalance 2619 1 1
 Intermediate imbalance 2403 0.96 (0.84 to 1.10) 0.96 (0.84 to 1.09)
 High imbalance 2109 1.22 (1.07 to 1.39) 1.17 (1.02 to 1.33)
Work unit level
 Low imbalance 2381 1 1
 Intermediate imbalance 1964 1.05 (0.90 to 1.22) 1.04 (0.89 to 1.22)
 High imbalance 2786 1.13 (0.98 to 1.30) 1.05 (0.91 to 1.21)

Only participants with no missing data in any of the covariates were included in these models.

Model 1 includes adjustment for age.

Model 2 includes adjustment for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking.