Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar;63(3):202–206. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.018275

Table 2 Mean (SD), paired t values, and effect size of the NFR and CIS at baseline and two year follow up among the drivers with (natural intervention group) and without (comparison group) an increase in working hours during the follow up.

Baseline (before increase in working hours) Two year follow up (after increase in working hours) Difference score (follow up–baseline) Paired t value Effect size n
Natural intervention group (increase in working hours)
 NFR, mean (SD) 38.1 (31.3) 50.7 (37.0) 12.6 (30.6) 4.20* 0.40 104
 CIS, mean (SD) 52.3 (23.7) 62.1 (26.3) 9.8 (24.9) 3.99* 0.41 103
Comparison group (no increase in working hours)
 NFR, mean (SD) 31.2 (31.1) 32.7 (32.9) 1.5 (26.5) 1.12 0.05 393
 CIS, mean (SD) 46.5 (20.3) 50.1 (21.5) 3.6 (19.3) 3.68* 0.18 381

*p<0.05 (two‐tailed).

Effect sizes:32 large effect (0.81–1.00); moderate effect (0.51–0.80); small effect (0.20–0.50); clinically irrelevant effect (0.00–0.19).