Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar;63(3):207–211. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020966

Table 2 Work strain and nicotine dependence.

Nicotine dependence* FTND†
Odds ratio CI Odds ratio CI
Work strain
 Low demand + high control Ref Ref
 Low demand + low control 1.0 0.7–1.4 2.2 1.3–3.8
 High demand + high control 1.2 0.8–1.7 1.9 1.1–3.3
 High demand + low control 1.6 1.1–2.4 3.4 1.7–7.0
Alcohol use
 No heavy drinking, dependence, abuse Ref Ref
 Heavy drinking‡ 2.1 1.3–3.4 0.6 0.3–1.3
 Dependence or abuse 2.8 1.9–4.2 1.2 0.5–2.8
Occupational main groups
 Senior officials Ref Ref
 Professionals 2.8 1.2–6.2 1.3 0.5–3.1
 Technicians, clerks 2.9 1.3–6.6 2.6 1.0–7.0
 Service, sales 2.8 1.2–6.7 1.8 0.6–5.1
 Agricultural, craft 2.8 1.2–6.5 2.9 1.1–7.9
 Elementary 3.0 1.3–6.7 1.7 0.7–4.2
Hours worked per week
 15–34 Ref Ref
 ⩾35 0.9 0.6–1.3 1.1 0.6–2.1

Logistic regression analysis. All variables in table 2 were entered into the regression model in addition to age (18–33, 34–49, 50–64) and sex.

*According to DSM‐IV.30

†Current smokers.

‡⩾20 g pure alcohol per day among women, ⩾30 g pure alcohol per day among men.

FTND Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence19 sum score ⩾1.

Current, former, or never smokers; n = 2549.