Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;45(5):813–vi. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.007

Table 3.

AUC, Difference in AUC, Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive Predictive Values 1 (PPV1) in DMIST by machine type

AUC Digital AUC Film AUC Difference Sensitivity Digital Sensitivity Film Specificity Digital Specificity Film PPV1 Digital PPV1 Film
All 0.775 (0.020) 0.744 (0.022) 0.032 (0.024) 0.697 (0.029) 0.657 (0.030) 0.918 (0.001) 0.917 (0.001) 0.048 (0.004) 0.045 (0.003)
Fischer 0.688 (0.045) 0.695 (0.045) -0.007 (0.049) 0.619 (0.061) 0.651 (0.060) 0.908 (0.003) 0.916 (0.003) 0.041 (0.006) 0.046 (0.007)
Fuji 0.788 (0.054) 0.730 (0.063) 0.058 (0.068) 0.727 (0.067) 0.591 (0.074) 0.934 (0.003) 0.930 (0.003) 0.052 (0.009) 0.040 (0.008)
General Electric 0.809 (0.024) 0.775 (0.028) 0.034 (0.031) 0.709 (0.040) 0.685 (0.041) 0.917 (0.002) 0.917 (0.002) 0.054 (0.006) 0.052 (0.005)

Numbers in Parentheses are Standard Errors

Negative Numbers indicate film AUC is greater than digital

There were no comparisons where p is significant at <0.0033.