Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 2;16(10):1604–1614. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0431-x

Table 5.

Number of surgeons (and percentage) for the different classes of instrumentation strategies

Patient number
1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) 5 (%)
A- All pedicle screws constructs 17 (61) 20 (63) 20 (63) 21 (66) 25 (78)
 All MoAS 9 (32) 12 (38) 9 (28) 11 (34) 13 (41)
 A2 All MuAS 3 (11) 3 (9) 2 (6) 3 (9) 3 (9)
 A3 MoAS thoracic–MuAS lumbar 2 (7) 1 (3) 3 (9) 4 (13) 4 (13)
 A4 MuAS on UFL and LFL only 2 (7) 2 (6) 2 (6) 2 (6) 3 (9)
 A5 Miscellaneous 1 (4) 2 (6) 4 (13) 1 (3) 2 (6)
B- All hooks constructs 1 (4) 2 (6) 0 (0) 2 (6) 0 (0)
C- Hybrid constructs 10 (36) 10 (31) 12 (38) 9 (28) 7 (22)
 C1 Hooks thoracic–MoAS lumbar 5 (18) 4 (13) 4 (13) 2 (6) 3 (9)
 C2 Hook on UFL only 3 (11) 3 (9) 4 (13) 3 (9) 0 (0)
 C3 Hooks thoracic–MuAS lumbar 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (3) 3 (9) 2 (6)
 C4 Miscellaneous 1 (4) 3 (9) 3 (9) 1 (3) 2 (6)

MoAS mono-axial screws, MuAS multi-axial screws, UFL upper fusion levels, LFL lowest fusion levels, AV apical vertebra