Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 14;16(10):1539–1550. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0391-1

Table 2.

Diagnostic values of index tests for discogenic pain in two or more studies

Author Pain free control disc Index cut off /details Sensitivity Specificity +LR −LR
MRI- High intensity zone (HIZ)
 April et al. [2] Yes Not stated 70 (56–82) 88 (77–95) 5.9 (2.8–12.5) 0.34(0.22–0.51)
 Ito et al. [18] No Not stated 52 (31–73) 89 (80–95) 4.8 (2.3–10.2) 0.54(0.35–0.82)
 Lam et al. [21] No Not stated 81 (71–88) 78 (65–88) 3.7 (2.2–6.0) 0.25(0.16–0.38)
 Lim et al. [28] No Not stated 56 (38–72) 70 (57–80) 1.8 (1.1–2.9) 0.64(0.43–0.96)
 Ricketson et al. [40] Yes Not stated 12 (4–27) 92 (80–98) 1.5 (0.4–5.6) 0.96(0.83–1.11)
 Schellhas et al. [43] Yes Not stated 97 (91–100) 83 (73–90) 5.7 (3.5–9.3) 0.03(0.01–0.11)
 Smith et al. [50] No Not stated 27 (13–45) 90 (83–95) 2.6 (1.2–5.6) 0.82(0.66–1.02)
 Weishaupt et al. [56] No Not stated 28 (16–42) 85 (74–92) 1.8 (0.8–3.7 0.86(0.70–1.04)
 Yoshida et al. [59] No Not stated/T2 scan 92 (69–99) 71 (55–84) 3.2 (1.9–5.3) 0.12 (0.03–0.55)
Not stated/ T1 scan 70 42–90) 74 (56–88) 2.7 (1.4–5.3) 0.40 (0.18–0.90)
 Saifuddin et al. [42] No Not stated 27 (18–37) 94 (86–98) 4.8 (1.7–14.2) 0.77 (0.67–0.89)
MRI- Disc degeneration (reduced signal intensity)
 Braithwaite et al. [5] No Not stated 86 (78–93) 78 (66–88) 4.0 (2.5–6.5) 0.18 (0.10–0.30)
 Carragee et al. [6] Yes  ≥ Grade 1 92 (69–99) 43 (30–56) 1.6 (1.2–2.1) 0.20 (0.04–0.93)
 ≥ Grade 2 81 (55–95) 62 (48–74) 2.1 (1.4–3.1) 0.32 (0.12–0.82)
 ≥ Grade 3 47 (24–72) 89 (78–96) 4.3 (1.8–10.2 0.59 (0.38–0.93)
 Horton et al. [17] No Dark & speckled 93 (72–100) 43 (27–59) 1.6 (1.2–2.2) 0.18 (0.04–0.85)
Dark only 38 (17–62) 87 (72–95) 2.8 (1.1–7.3) 0.72 (0.50–1.04)
 Ito et al. [18] No Moderate & severe 94 (76–100) 46 (35–58) 1.7 (1.4–2.2) 0.14 (0.03–0.65)
Severe 69 (47–86) 88 (79–94) 5.7 (3.0–11.0) 0.36 (0.20–0.65)
 Lim et al. [28] No Grade IV and V 87 (72 96) 52 (40–65) 1.8 (1.4–2.4) 0.25 (0.10–0.60)
 Parker et al. [37] No Dark disc 89 (69–98) 68 (41–88) 2.8 (1.4–5.6) 0.16 (0.05–0.52)
 Weishaupt et al. [56] No Slight, moderate & severe 97 (88–100) 59 (46–70) 2.3 (1.8–3.1) 0.05 (0.01–0.26)
 Osti et al. [36] No Decreased & absent 69 (52–82) 64 (52–75) 1.9 (1.3–2.7) 0.49 (0.30–0.80)
Absent 24 (12–40) 91 (83–97) 2.8 (1.1–7.0) 0.83 (0.69–1.00)
Endplate/Modic changes
 Braithwaite et al. [5] No Grade 1–3 24 (15–34) 96 (88–99) 6.0 (1.7–21.2) 0.80 (0.70–0.90)
Grade 1 5 (2–13) 99 (93–100) 7.4 (0.4–131) 0.95 (0.90–1.00)
Grade 2 18 (10–27) 96 (88–99) 4.4 (1.2–16.1) 0.86 (0.77–0.95)
Grade 3 4 (1–10) 99 (93–100) 4.7 (2.5–89.3) 0.97 (0.93–1.02)
 Ito et al. [18] No All grades 23 (8–45) 94 (87–98) 4.0 (1.3–12.8) 0.82 (0.65–1.02)
 Lim et al. [28] No Not stated 10 (3–25) 82 (70 90) 0.6 (0.2–1.7) 1.1(0.94–1.3)
 Weishaupt et al. [56] No Grade 1 all 30 (17–34) 96 (89–99) 8.2 (2.2–29.7) 0.73 (0.61–0.88)
Grade 1 (moderate & severe) 24 (13–38) 99 (93–100) 32.4 (2.0–536.7) 0.77 (0.66–0.90)
Grade 2 all 19 (10–33) 98 (91–100) 8.9 (1.7–48.0) 0.82 (0.72–0.95)
Grade 2 (moderate & severe) 15 (6–29) 99 (93–100) 21.1 (1.2–361.2) 0.85 (0.76–0.96)
Grade 1&2 (all) 48 (34–63) 95 (87–99) 9.5 (3.3–27.3) 0.55 (0.42–0.72)
Grade 1&2 (moderate & severe) 38 (24–53) 99 (93–100) 52.1 (3.2–844.1) 0.63 (0.50–0.78)
 Kokkonen et al. [20] No  ≥ Grade 1 41 (25–58) 63 (50–75) 1.1 (0.7–1.8) 0.93 (0.68–1.29)
 ≥ Grade 2 22 (10–39) 78 (67–88) 1.0 (0.5–2.2) 0.99 (0.8–1.23)
 ≥ Grade 3 4 (0–16) 98 (91–100) 1.8 (0.2–16.4) 0.98 (0.91–1.06)
MRI- Annular disruption
 Vanharanta et al. [54] No Not stated 94 (87–98) 55 (46–63) 2.1 (1.7–2.5) 0.10 (0.04–0.26)
 Yrjama et al. [63] No Grade 3 65 (43–83) 64 (24–94) 1.8 (0.64–5.1) 0.55 (0.25–1.19)
MRI - Narrowing
 Ito et al. [18] No Moderate & severe 85 (65–96) 69 (58–79) 2.8 (1.9–3.9) 0.21 (0.08–0.56)
Severe 31 (14–53) 97 (90–100) 9.9 (2.5–38.3) 0.71 (0.54–0.93)
 Lim et al. [28] No Not stated 30 (16–48) 82 (70–91) 1.7 (0.8–3.5) 0.85 (0.67–1.09)
Clinical examination - Centralisation
 Donelson et al. [12] Yes Not stated* 64 (46–79) 70 (50–86) 2.1 (1.1–3.9) 0.52 (0.32–0.86)
 Young et al. [60] Yes Not stated* 47 (22–73) 95 (62–100) 9.4 (0.6–146.9) 0.56 (0.35–0.91)
 Laslett et al. [25] Yes Partial & full exam* 38 (26–51) 89 (69–98) 3.5 (1.0–11.7) 0.70 (0.55–0.89)
Full examination* 40 (27–55) 92 (69–99) 4.9 (1.0–23.3 0.65 (0.50–0.84)
 Laslett et al. [26] Yes Complete & partial centralisers* 35 (22–51) 86 (62–98) 2.6 (0.8–8.7) 0.75 (0.56–0.99)
Complete centralisers* 23 (12–38) 97 (77–100) 8.2 (0.5–133.0) 0.78 (0.67–0.95)
Pooled results
Spinous process bony vibration
 Vanharantaet al. [54] No Not stated* 71 (57–82) 60 (39–80) 1.8 (1.1–3.0) 0.49 (0.29–0.82)
Not stated (per disc) 63 (51–73) 77 (69–84) 2.7 (1.9–3.9) 0.48 (0.36–0.65)
 Yrjama et al. [63] No Not stated* 60 (39–80) 64 (24–94) 1.7 (0.60–4.8) 0.62 (0.29–1.29
 Yrjama et al. [62] No Not stated* 65 (44 82) 58 (28–84) 1.5 (0.8–3.1) 0.61 (0.31–1.22)
 Yrjama et al. [61] No Not stated* 71 (54–84) 63 (38–83) 1.9 (1.0–3.4) 0.47 (0.26–0.85)
Not stated (per disc) 79 (57–94) 82 (53–97) 4.5 (1.4–14.0 0.25 (0.11–0.59)

* Analysis at the level of the patient, all others at the level of the disc. +LR, positive likelihood ratio; −LR, negative likelihood ratio; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging