Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 14;16(10):1539–1550. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0391-1

Table 3.

Diagnostic values of index tests for Facet jt and SIJ pain in two or more studies

Author Controlled double block / % pain relief Sensitivity Specificity +LR −LR
 Facet joint studies
  Revel’s criteria
  Revel et al. [38] No / >75% 96 (71–100) 65 (46–81) 2.8 (1.7–4.5) 0.06 (0.00–0.85)
  Laslett et al. [23] No / abolition of pain 18 (5–43) 93 (86–97) 2.6 (0.8–8.6) 0.88 (0.70–1.10)
  Manchikati [31] Yes / >75% 13 (7–22) 84 (76–90) 0.8 (0.4–1.7) 1.03 (0.92–1.16)
  Revel et al. [39] No/ >75% 63 (41–82) 87 (64–98) 4.8 (1.4–15.9) 0.43 (0.24–0.75)
  Age >65
  Revel et al. [38] No / >75% 39 (15–68) 78 (60–91) 1.8 (0.7–4.7) 0.78 (0.49–1.23)
  Manchikati et al. [30] Yes / >75% 19 (10–32) 66 (54–78) 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 1.21 (0.98–1.51)
  Manchikati et al. [31] Yes / >75% 22 (14–32) 85 (77–91) 1.5 (0.8–2.6) 0.92 (0.80–1.05)
 Pain reduced with recumbancy
  Reve1 et al. [38] No / >75% 89 (62–99) 25 (11–44) 1.2 (0.9–1.6) 0.43 (0.08–2.20)
  Reve1 et al. [39] No / >75% 89 (69–98) 45 (22–69) 1.6 (1.1–2.5 0.24 (0.07–0.87)
  Manchikati et al. [31] Yes / >75% 94 (86–98) 17 (10–25) 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 0.39 (0.18–0.96)
  Pain not increased with cough
  Reve1 et al. [38] No / >75% 96 (71–100) 35 (19–55) 1.5 (1.1–2.0) 0.10 (0.01–1.62)
 Reve1 et al. [39] No / >75% 80 (59–94) 50 (27–73) 1.6 (1.0–2.6) 0.39 (0.15–1.01)
  Manchikati et al. [31] Yes / >75% 90 (82–95) 13 (8–21) 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 0.76 (0.34–1.66)
  Pain not increased with forward flexion
  Reve1 et al. [38] No / >75% 96 (71–100) 48 (30–67) 1.9 (1.3–2.7) 0.07 (0.01–1.15)
  Reve1 et al. [39] No / >75% 63 (41–82) 76 (52–92) 2.7 (1.1–6.3) 0.48 (0.27–0.87)
  Manchikati et al. [31] Yes / >75% 16 (9–25) 82 (73–88) 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 1.03 (0.91–1.17)
  Pain not increased with rising from flexion
  Reve1 et al. [38] No / >75% 96 (71–100) 58 (39–76) 2.3 (1.5–3.6) 0.06 (0.00–0.97)
  Reve1 et al. [39] No / >75% 76 (54–91) 55 (31–78) 1.7 (1.0–2.9) 0.43 (0.19–1.00)
  Manchikati et al. [31] Yes / >75% 55 (44–65) 48 (39–58) 1.1 (0.8–1.4) 0.94 (0.70–1.26)
  Pain not increased with hyperextension
  Reve1 et al. [38] No / >75% 89 (62–99) 62 (42–79) 2.3 (1.4–3.8) 0.17 (0.04–0.81)
  Revel et al. [39] No / >75% 54 (33–75) 71 (46–89) 1.9 (0.8–4.2) 0.64 (0.38–1.09)
  Manchikati et al. [31] Yes / >75% 10 (5–18) 86 (78–92) 0.7 (0.3–1.5) 1.05 (0.95–1.16)
  Pain not increased with extension/rotation
  Reve1 et al. [38] No / >75% 75 (46–94) 48 (30–67) 1.5 (0.9–2.3) 0.52 (0.19–1.38)
  Reve1 et al. [39] No / >75% 68 (45–85) 76 (52–92) 2.8 (1.2–6.7) 0.43 (0.23–0.81)
  Manchikati et al. [31] Yes / >75% 68 (57–77) 30 (22–40) 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 1.07 (0.71–1.61)
  No centralisation
  Young et al. [60] No / >80% 97 (73–100) 15 (1–50) 1.1 (0.9–1.5) 0.22 (0.01–4.93)
  Laslett et al. [27] No / >95% 96 (65–100) 16 (8–28) 1.1 (1.0–1.4) 0.28 (0.02–4.43)
 Traumatic onset
  Manchikati et al. [30] Yes / >75% 54 (40–67) 47 (35–60) 1.01 (0.7–1.4) 0.99 (0.67–1.44)
  Manchikati et al. [31] Yes / >75% 48 (37–59) 50 (41–59) 1.0 (0.7–1.3) 1.05 (0.80–1.37)
SIJ studies
 3 of more positive pain provocation procedures
  Laslett et al. [24] No / > 80% 74 (50–90) 74 (55–89) 2.9 (1.5–5.6) 0.35 (0.17–0.75)
  Laslett et al. [22] Yes / >80% 89 (59–99) 80 (62–92) 4.4 (2.1–8.9) 0.15 (0.03–0.66)
  Young et al. [60] No / > 80% 76 (56–90) 69 (50–85) 2.5 (1.4–4.4) 0.35 (0.17–0.71)
  van der Wurff et al. [52] Yes / >50% 84 (65–95) 78 (60–90) 3.8 (2.0–7.3) 0.21 (0.09–0.49)
 Thigh thrust
  Dreyfuss et al. [13] Yes / >80% 42 (28–58) 45 (30–61) 0.8 (0.5–1.2) 1.28 (0.84–1.94)
  Laslett et al. [24] No / >80% 69 (45–87) 64 (44–81) 1.9 (1.1–3.3) 0.49 (0.24–0.97)
 Sacral Thrust
  Dreyfuss et al. [13] No / >90% 51 (36–66) 40 (25–57) 0.9 (0.6–1.2) 1.22 (0.76–1.96)
  Laslettt et al. [24] No / >80% 55 (32–76) 74 (55–89) 2.1 (1.0–4.4) 0.61 (0.36–1.02)
 Bone scan
  Maigne et al. [29] No / >75% 46 (20–74) 93 (72–100) 6.2 (1.2–31.9) 0.58 (0.35–0.96)
  Slipman et al. [49] No / > 80% 14 (4–31) 98 (79–100) 5.6 (0.3–99.0) 0.88 (0.75–1.03)

SIJ, sacroiliac joint; +LR, positive likelihood ratio; −LR, negative likelihood ratio