Skip to main content
. 2007 May 23;64(10):642–650. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.030643

Table 3 Trials of exercise interventions.

Study (IV score) Methods Subjects Intervention Outcomes Results
Exercise at work
Gundewall RCT: stratified then 69 nurses/nursing (1) 20‐min strength, endurance, LBP intensity, number Reduction of LBP
et al30 random allocation aides with and coordination exercise (6 sessions/ of days with LBP, lost prevalence (p<0.02), LBP
(2.5/6) to 2 groups. Follow‐ without LBP work‐ month for 13 months); (2) no work days due to LBP intensity (p<0.04) and lost
up 13 months ing in hospital intervention work days (p<0.01)
Wigaeus RCT: random 131 nursing All sessions 40 min, 2×/week for LBP intensity Unclear: Josephson et al26
Hjelm allocation to 3 aides working 6 months: (1) bicycle ergometer; report no significant
et al,25 groups. Follow‐ in hospital (2) 3×15 repetitions on 7 differences; Wigaeus Hjelm
Josephson up 6 months equipments; (3) education in et al25 report reduced LBP in (1)
et al26 occupational health and stress and (2) vs (3) in those with
(1.5/6) management LBP at baseline
Dehlin NCT: allocation by 46 female nursing 2×/week for 8 weeks: Frequency, intensity, Reduction in LBP duration
et al28 work building to 3 aides with (1) strengthening exercise; (2) 30‐ duration of LBP and in (1) vs (2). No other
(0/6) groups. Follow‐up LBP working min lectures on medicine and influence of LBP on significant differences
8 weeks in hospital nursing care; (3) no intervention working capacity
Dehlin NCT: allocation by 45 female nursing 2×/week for 8 weeks: (1) 45‐min Frequency, intensity, No significant differences
et al29 work building to 3 aides with LBP endurance and aerobic exercise; duration of LBP and
(0/6) groups. Follow‐up working in (2) manual handling training; influence of LBP on
8 weeks hospital (3) no intervention working capacity
 
Exercise at home
Horneij RCT: random 282 female (1) Posture, balance, endurance, LBP prevalence, No significant differences in
et al27 allocation to 3 nursing aides functional, stretching and interference with LBP, but (1) had less activity
(4.5/6) groups. Follow‐up working in home‐ cardiovascular exercises activities, pain interference compared with (3)
12 and 18 months care services (suggested ⩾2×/week); (2) stress drawing at 12‐month follow‐up
reduction training 7×1.5 h
plus follow‐up; (3) “live as usual”

IV, internal validity.