Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 25;64(10):659–665. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.031310

Table 4 Odds ratios for health impairment, as indicated by poor self‐rated health, GHQ‐caseness and doctor‐diagnosed depression, by levels of effort‐reward imbalance and combined organisational injustice among healthy employees at baseline*.

Psychosocial factor Incident poor self‐rated health Incident GHQ‐caseness Incident doctor‐diagnosed depression
10‐Town study Hospital Personnel study 10‐Town study Hospital Personnel study 10‐Town study Hospital Personnel study
Effort‐reward imbalance (quartiles)
 1 (lowest) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 2 1.00 (0.87 to 1.14) 1.20 (0.95 to 1.53) 1.25 (1.09 to 1.42) 1.23 (0.97 to 1.57) 1.01 (0.81 to 1.25) 1.54 (0.93 to 2.55)
 3 1.11 (0.98 to 1.26) 0.89 (0.68 to 1.18) 1.40 (1.4 to 1.59) 1.26 (0.96 to 1.64) 1.06 (0.87 to 1.28) 1.43 (0.82 to 2.48)
 4 (highest) 1.44 (1.27 to 1.65) 1.30 (1.00 to 1.69) 1.85 (1.63 to 2.11) 1.38 (1.06 to 1.79) 1.49 (1.22 to 1.81) 1.52 (0.89 to 2.58)
 Test for trend p<0.001 p = 0.25 p<0.001 p = 0.03 p<0.001 p = 0.24
Organisational injustice (quartiles)
 1 (lowest) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 2 1.08 (0.95 to 1.23) 1.03 (0.80 to 1.32) 1.29 (1.13 to 1.46) 1.30 (1.00 to 1.67) 1.12 (0.92 to 1.38) 0.96 (0.56 to 1.64)
 3 1.26 (1.10 to 1.43) 1.14 (0.88 to 1.46) 1.29 (1.14 to 1.47) 1.62 (1.25 to 2.08) 1.24 (1.01 to 1.52) 1.46 (0.89 to 2.41)
 4 (highest) 1.36 (1.18 to 1.55) 1.20 (0.93 to 1.55) 1.56 (1.37 to 1.79) 1.64 (1.26 to 2.13) 1.52 (1.24 to 1.86) 1.87 (1.15 to 3.05)
 Test for trend p<0.001 p = 0.08 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p = 0.002

*Models include age, sex, occupational status, effort‐reward imbalance and organisational injustice as predictors.