Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2005;136(3):697–713. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.019

Table 1.

Comparison of pair-wise percentage overlap in the basal forebrain in case 96001*

Total MS/VDB HDB VP
CH/CB 50.13 ± 22.3a 48.30 ± 32.0b 27.95 ± 21.4 11.1 ± 17.1a,b
CH/CR 46.17 ± 20.7 62.05 ± 20.4 36.91 ± 33.2 26.38 ± 24.9
PV/CB 26.36 ± 22.5 28.98 ± 22.25 57.13 ± 35.7c 15.96 ± 18.6c
PV/CR 15.54 ± 13.0d 32.90 ± 25.8 51.78 ± 32.7d 28.78 ± 34.2
*

Values are expressed as mean and standard deviation. Same superscript letters denote significant differences between corresponding structures.

a,b

One-way ANOVA revealed that CH/CB overlap percentage from MS/VDB and VP differed significantly (F(3,27) = 1.38, P < 0.05). Tukey’s post hoc revealed that the MS/VDB had significantly more CH/CB overlap than the VP.

c

The PV/CB overlap percentage between HDB and VP differed significantly (F(3, 28) = 2.25, P < 0.05). Tukey’s post hoc revealed that the HDB had significantly more PV/CB overlap than the VP.

d

The PV/CR overlap percentage between the total and HDB differed significantly (F(3,28) = 3.54, P < 0.05). Tukey’s post hoc test revealed that the HDB had significantly more PV/CR overlap than using the total database.