Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Dis. 2007 May 22;27(3):265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.05.003

Table 5.

Ganglioside Content and Distribution in Caudate of Huntington Disease Subjects

Control HD
1 2 3 Average 1 2 3 Average
Age 49 55 22 42 46 53 54 51
Sex M M M - M F M -

Ganglioside content (μg sialic acid / 100 mg dry weight)a
Difference %
Total 205 393 276 291 ± 55 172 260 93 175 ± 48 -40

GM1 37.4 58.6 82.0 59.3 ± 12.9 36.6 53.5 18.8 36.3 ± 10.0 -39
GD3 8.8 3.5 3.8 5.4 ± 1.7 9.9 16.9 15.5 14.1 ± 2.2 * 162
GD1a 45.9 115.2 88.1 83.1 ± 20.2 42.9 52.5 16.2 37.2 ± 10.9 -55
GD2 7.1 3.8 2.0 4.3 ± 1.5 2.4 4.1 1.6 2.7 ± 0.7 -37
GD1b 46.3 85.4 43.7 58.5 ± 13.5 36.4 58.4 14.7 36.5 ± 12.6 -38
GT1b 52.5 112.2 51.5 72.0 ± 20.1 39.7 64.4 22.7 42.2 ± 12.1 -41
GQ1b 7.4 13.8 5.2 8.8 ± 2.6 4.5 10.6 3.4 6.2 ± 2.2 -30
a

Determined from densitometric scanning of HPTLC as shown in Figure 6.

*

Indicates that the value is significantly different from that of the control caudate at p < 0.05 as determined by the two-tailed Student’s t-test.