Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov;91(11):885–891. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.083980

Table 4 Clinical utility of the children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events rule.

No clinically significant head injury Clinically significant head injury Total
CHALICE negative 19 558 4 19 562
CHALICE positive 2 933 277 3 210
Total 22 491 281 22 772
Sensitivity 98.6% (96.4% to 99.6%)
Specificity 86.9% (86.5% to 87.4%)
Positive predictive value 8.63% (7.68% to 9.65%)
Negative predictive value 99.9% (99.9% to 100%)
CT ordering rate 14.1% (13.6% to 14.6%)
 
Performance of CHALICE rule for patients with GCS 13–15
No significant intracranial pathology Significant intracranial pathology Total
CHALICE negative 19 558 4 19 562
CHALICE positive 2 853 164 3 017
Total 22 411 168 22 579
Sensitivity 97.6% (94.0% to 99.4%)
Specificity 87.3% (86.8% to 87.7%)
Positive predictive value 5.44% (4.65% to 6.31%)
Negative predictive value 99.9% (99.9% to 100%)
CT ordering rate 13.3% (12.9% to 13.8%)
 
Performance of CHALICE rule for prediction of neurosurgical intervention
No neurosurgical intervention Neurosurgical intervention Total
CHALICE negative 19 559 3 19 562
CHALICE positive 3 076 134 3 210
Total 22 635 137 22 772
Sensitivity 97.8% (93.7% to 99.6%)
Specificity 86.4% (86.0% to 86.9%)

CHALICE, children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events; CT, computed tomography; GCS, Glasgow Coma Score.

Values in parentheses are 95% CI.