Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 29;92(5):399–403. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.103986

graphic file with name ac103986.f3.jpg

Figure 3 Alternative Bayesian MCMC estimation of the relationship between fall in %fat and fall in BMI SDS. Median posterior predicted values are shown together with 95% credible regions, shown as dotted, short‐dashed and long‐dashed lines, respectively, for pairs of results which were 0.25, 0.75 and 1.25 years apart.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure