Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 28;2(11):e1235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001235

Table 9. Coverage of genes with Pfam domains in the rice FL-cDNA libraries.

Pfam ID (a) InterPro ID (a) Short name All loci CDS-AE CDS-ANE CDS-AE proportion (b) Significance (c) Ecoli (d)
PF00076 IPR000504 RNP1_RNA_bd 233 204 29 87.6 High
PF00400 IPR001680 WD40 212 198 14 93.4 High
PF00036 IPR002048 EF_hand_Ca_bd 164 137 27 83.5 High
PF00271 IPR001650 Helicase_C 131 117 14 89.3 High 1
PF00657 IPR001087 Lipase_GDSL 113 92 21 81.4 High 1
PF00515 IPR001440 TPR_1 108 99 9 91.7 High 1
PF00226 IPR001623 DnaJ_N 108 92 16 85.2 High 1
PF00004 IPR003959 AAA_ATPase_core 106 94 12 88.7 High 1
PF00106 IPR002198 SDR 97 80 17 82.5 High 1
PF00561 IPR000073 AB_hydrolase_1 91 81 10 89.0 High 1
PF00069 IPR000719 Prot_kinase 1289 892 397 69.2 Low 1
PF00560 IPR001611 LRR 890 533 357 59.9 Low 1
PF00646 IPR001810 F-box 716 413 303 57.7 Low
PF00931 IPR002182 NB-ARC 427 212 215 49.6 Low
PF07197 IPR010811 DUF1409 253 6 247 2.4 Low
PF06654 IPR009546 DUF1165 231 4 227 1.7 Low
PF00098 IPR001878 Znf_CCHC 226 46 180 20.4 Low
PF03578 IPR005213 HGWP 215 3 212 1.4 Low
PF05699 IPR008906 HATC 215 32 183 14.9 Low
PF00023 IPR002110 ANK 176 113 63 64.2 Low 1
Domain-coded CDS 24247 17459 6788 72.0
a

: The domain information was taken from TIGR OSA1 (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/e2k1/osa1/index.shtml).

b

: The ratio was calculated as the number of CDS-AE loci/total number of loci.

c

: Significances of difference were examined between the CDS-AE proportion for genes encoding the respective domain and that for genes encoding the entire domains examined by the chi-squared test. High (Low) represents the cloning efficiency of genes encoding the respective domain was higher (lower) than the collection efficiency of genes encoding the entire domains examined.

d

: Pfam domain data for E. coli K12 published at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/. A value of 1 indicates that genes encoding the corresponding domain are found in the E. coli K12 genome.