Skip to main content
. 1997 May 27;94(11):5709–5712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5709

Table 3.

Efficiency of chimera formation and germline colonization by ES cell lines

Source Strain Sex No. of lines giving chimerism/ no. tested Range in % of chimeras among liveborn young No. of lines giving germline colonization/no. tested Range in % of chimeras that transmitted Strain of host blastocysts
Fourth-day intact blastocyst 129 Male 2/2 38–44 2/2 25–75 PO
129 Female 2/2 10–36 1/1 100 PO
Single-cell suspension of 5th-day epiblast 129 Male 4/4 9–24 1/4 50 PO
2/2 71–100 2/2 75–100 C57BL/6
Epiblast from delayed-implanting blastocyst 129 ND 5/7 40–75 3/4 33–100 MF1
Epiblast from delayed-implanting blastocyst PO ND 1/3 13 1/1 100 C57BL/6
Epiblast from delayed-implanting blastocyst C57BL/6 Male 1/1 46 ?/1* MF1
Epiblast from delayed-implanting blastocyst CBA/Ca Male 2/4 21–33 2/2 25–50 C57BL/6
5/5 15–100 0/2 MF1
3/3 31–70 3/3 20–50 PO
*

Test breeding in progress. 

These were female chimeras; all other chimeras tested were male. 

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure