Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jul 5;65(7):1442–1457. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.033

Table 5.

Correlations between literacy measures and simulated client ratings of communication effectiveness

Simulated client ratings (n=147) Simulated spouse ratings (n=63)
Literacy Measures Nonverbal behavior Satisfaction with communication Affect Nonverbal behavior Satisfaction with communication Affect
REAL-G Variables
All REAL-G words −.05 −.06 −.08 −.05 .06 .00
Unique REAL-G words −.02 −.05 −.13 .01 .15 .00
Mean REAL-G repetitions −.03 .00 .03 .05 −.04 .09
Ratio of REAL-G words to total transcript words −.15+ −.18+ −.07 −.19 −.03 −.22
Language Complexity
Average syllables per word −.07 −.10 −.09 −.13 −.12 −.05
Average words per sentence −.19* −.21* −.08 −.21+ −.08 −.10
Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade level −.23** −.28*** −.12 −.31* −.15 −.13
Flesch Reading Ease .21* .26** .14+ .31* .19 .13
% passive sentences −.24** −.29*** −.19* −.27* −.24+ −.16
Dialogue Pacing
Session length .15* .15* .08 .20+ .24* .11
Syllables/second .02 .00 .00 .04 .03 .09
Dialogue Density
Number of turns .31*** .35*** .15+ .43** .40** .35**
Turn density −.35*** −.40*** −.19* −.39** −.39** −.41**
Interactivity
Interactivity (turns per minute) .28** .30*** .12 .38** .35** .36**
+

p < .10;

*

p< .05;

**

p< .01;

***

p<.001